\n
![](\"https:\/\/static.fibre2fashion.com\/Newsresource\/images\/313\/cambodian-workers-craft-clothing-shoes-and-bags_325525.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
\n<\/p>\n
The new rate takes effect on January 1, 2027. The decision followed 17 rounds of negotiations between employers and workers, which ultimately failed to produce a common figure. Employers wanted to retain the $210 rate, while the majority worker-side proposal stood at $225. When the National Council for Minimum Wage voted, the $210 proposal secured 47 of 51 votes. Prime Minister Hun Manet then reportedly added $2, bringing the official minimum to $212.<\/p>\n
That is the decision. The real story, however, lies in what happened before it\u2014and what different stakeholders made of it afterwards.<\/p>\n
Cambodia has set a $212 monthly minimum wage for garment, textile, footwear and travel-goods workers from January 1, 2027, up $2 from $210.
\nWorkers had sought $225 after unions earlier demanded $250.66; employers wanted to retain $210 with a temporary $2.50 allowance.
\nThe sector employs nearly one million workers and exported $11.76 billion in the first eight months of 2026, up 7.2 per cent.<\/p>\n
For workers and unions, the gap was never just $2. Seven trade unions had initially called for a minimum wage of $250.66, arguing that the existing wage had fallen short of the cost of meeting basic household needs. As negotiations progressed, the majority worker-side proposal settled at $225. The $250.66 demand was backed by 125 civil-society organisations, which said their position drew on research into workers\u2019 living conditions and the gap between statutory wages and a living wage.<\/p>\n
Their argument is fundamentally about purchasing power. A higher nominal wage does not necessarily mean a better standard of living if food, rent, utilities, transport, healthcare and education are rising at the same time.<\/p>\n
Meanwhile, the president of the Cambodian Alliance of Trade Unions reportedly called the $2 increase inadequate, arguing that it could not meaningfully respond to inflation and expressing concern that some workers struggled to afford sufficiently nutritious food.<\/p>\n
Employers approached the same number from the opposite direction. Their proposal was to keep the minimum at $210 while retaining the temporary $2.50 monthly allowance for transport and accommodation costs introduced earlier in 2026.<\/p>\n
Their concern is the cost of remaining competitive in an export industry exposed to international buyers and regional rivals. In the negotiations, employer-side representatives reportedly pointed to productivity, profitability, labour-market conditions and Cambodia\u2019s competitiveness as factors that must accompany any discussion of wages.<\/p>\n
The government\u2019s position sits between those competing pressures. Cambodia\u2019s minimum-wage framework is built around balancing workers\u2019 needs with factors including family circumstances, inflation, cost of living, productivity, national competitiveness, labour-market conditions and sector profitability.<\/p>\n
The government has therefore portrayed the $212 outcome as a compromise under difficult economic circumstances rather than simply a wage calculation.<\/p>\n
Meanwhile, a renowned economist of the country, quoted after the decision, similarly framed the dispute as a clash of interests: workers want higher incomes, while employers want to contain costs. He also pointed to global uncertainty, wars and geopolitical tensions as additional pressures on businesses, while reportedly acknowledging that a $2 increase would not fully offset rising prices.<\/p>\n
The stakes explain why the argument is so intense. Cambodia\u2019s garment, footwear and travel-goods sector employs nearly one million workers, most of them women, and recorded $11.76 billion in exports in the first eight months of 2026, up 7.2 per cent year on year.<\/p>\n
The $212 decision settled the contentious minimum-wage issue for now, but it also brought the underlying fault lines into sharper focus. Workers argued for a wage that better reflected the rising cost of living; employers prioritised containing costs and protecting competitiveness; and the government sought to strike a balance between the two.<\/p>\n
In the end, neither side got what it wanted. Workers secured a $2 increase, but the final figure remained well below their $225 negotiating position and the earlier $250.66 demand. Meanwhile, employers failed to preserve the $210 minimum they sought. The $212 figure is therefore less a victory for either side than a measure of the competing pressures shaping Cambodia\u2019s most important export industry.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Fibre2Fashion News Desk (DR)<\/p>\n
\n <\/p><\/div>\n