{"id":20738,"date":"2025-10-25T08:22:10","date_gmt":"2025-10-25T08:22:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tezgyan.com\/index.php\/2025\/10\/25\/buying-jewellery-on-cards-but-not-keeping-bills-this-rs-1-65-crore-i-t-case-says-why-it-matters-tax-news\/"},"modified":"2025-10-25T08:22:10","modified_gmt":"2025-10-25T08:22:10","slug":"buying-jewellery-on-cards-but-not-keeping-bills-this-rs-1-65-crore-i-t-case-says-why-it-matters-tax-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tezgyan.com\/index.php\/2025\/10\/25\/buying-jewellery-on-cards-but-not-keeping-bills-this-rs-1-65-crore-i-t-case-says-why-it-matters-tax-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Buying Jewellery On Cards But Not Keeping Bills? This Rs 1.65 Crore I-T Case Says Why It Matters | Tax News"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n<\/p>\n

\n

Last Updated:<\/span>

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ruled for a man in a Rs 1.65 crore jewellery case, saying assets in his wife’s tax returns can’t be taxed again, ending a long dispute<\/h2>\n
<\/p>\n
\n
\n
\n
\"font\"<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\"Experts<\/p>\n

Experts advice proper documentation for high-value purchases to avoid disputes.<\/p>\n<\/figure>\n

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has ruled in favour of a Bengaluru resident in a case involving the seizure of gold and silver jewellery worth Rs 1.65 crore. The judgement, delivered on September 11, 2025, brings an end to a long legal dispute between the taxpayer and the Income Tax Department.<\/p>\n

According to case details, officials from the Income Tax Department conducted a search at the residence of Suresh (name withheld) on November 14, 2019. During the search, gold and silver ornaments valued at Rs 1.65 crore were seized. The department later issued a notice, stating that the jewellery had been acquired without proper documentation and categorised it as an \u201cunexplained investment”.<\/p>\n

Suresh, however, argued that the jewellery belonged to his wife and had been purchased through banking channels, including credit cards. But investigators pointed out that the bills produced by him did not match the jewellery that was seized. As a result, the department added the value of the ornaments to his taxable income and imposed additional tax.<\/p>\n

Suresh appealed the decision before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), where he received relief. The Income Tax Department then escalated the matter to the ITAT.<\/p>\n

After examining the submissions, the tribunal ruled in Suresh\u2019s favour. The ITAT observed that the jewellery in question had already been disclosed in his wife\u2019s income tax returns and, therefore, could not be taxed again in Suresh\u2019s name. Taxing the same assets twice, the tribunal said, was unjustified.<\/p>\n

Chartered Accountant Suresh Surana, commenting on the case, advised taxpayers to maintain proper bills, receipts and documents for high-value purchases, especially jewellery, to avoid similar disputes with tax authorities.<\/p>\n

The ruling is expected to offer relief to several taxpayers facing similar cases and reinforces the importance of transparency in financial documentation.<\/p>\n

Follow News18 on Google<\/a>. Join the fun, play QIK games on News18<\/a>. Stay updated with all the latest business news, including market trends<\/a>,\u00a0stock updates<\/a>,\u00a0tax<\/a>, IPO,\u00a0banking finance<\/a>, real estate, savings and investments. To Get in-depth analysis, expert opinions, and real-time updates. Also Download the\u00a0News18 App<\/a> to stay updated.<\/span><\/div>\n
First Published:<\/span><\/p>\n
\n

October 25, 2025, 13:36 IST<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

News<\/a> business<\/a> tax<\/a> Buying Jewellery On Cards But Not Keeping Bills? This Rs 1.65 Crore I-T Case Says Why It Matters<\/span><\/div>\n
\n
\n
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users\u2019 views, not News18\u2019s. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use<\/a> and Privacy Policy<\/a>.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Read More<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n


\n
Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Last Updated:October 25, 2025, 13:36 IST Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ruled for a man in a Rs 1.65 crore jewellery case, saying assets in his wife’s tax returns can’t be taxed again, ending a long dispute Experts advice proper documentation for high-value purchases to avoid disputes. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has ruled in…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3925,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[45],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20738","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-business"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tezgyan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20738","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tezgyan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tezgyan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tezgyan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tezgyan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20738"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/tezgyan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20738\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tezgyan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3925"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tezgyan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20738"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tezgyan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20738"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tezgyan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20738"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}